Legal Insights on Intel Evaluation and Clinton Campaign
On Thursday, Greg Jarrett appeared on Fox Business, discussing the legal implications surrounding the 2017 Intel evaluation related to the Steel Dejar story. He presented points that may be significant for future discussions.
A report issued on the same day unveiled an email from Leonard Bernard, an associate of George Soros. This email, sent to advisors of Hillary Clinton in July 2016, confirmed that Clinton approved a strategy to associate Donald Trump with Russian hackers during the election. While on “Editing the Evening,” Jarrett argued that the actions of individuals like Clinton, officials from the DNC, and George Soros might have stretched the boundaries of laws concerning potential criminal prosecution.
“Concealment has been a recurring theme for years, extending the law’s reach regarding criminal conspiracy cases. The clock is ticking as hidden evidence comes to light,” he explained.
Jarrett suggested that if the FBI finds incriminating documents that are stashed away by former FBI director James Comey, this could be seen as obstruction of justice, thereby resetting legal time limits.
He illustrated this by mentioning that the new FBI team, under Kash Patel, recently found a crime document concealed in a burn bag. They also located a hard drive that Comey had left under lock and key.
Jarrett further stated that the Russiagate situation could embody a variety of criminal conspiracies. “There are many corrupt actors involved, and I believe this reflects governmental fraud, disenfranchisement under the guise of law, and importantly, obstruction of justice,” he added.
Director of National Intelligence Tarsi Gabbard claimed there is “overwhelming evidence” that former President Barack Obama and his national security team politicized intelligence reporting after Trump’s 2016 victory. This includes references to the Steel Dejar report, which consists of unverified, manufactured claims about Trump’s connections to Russia.
It’s noteworthy that the Clinton campaign and DNC financed the compilation by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele in 2016. However, this collection later lost credibility; in October 2022, FBI analyst Brian Orton revealed that the FBI had provided Steele with $1 million to validate the claims, but Steele failed to do so.
