WASHINGTON (AP) — Tom Brandy, who grows alfalfa in California’s Imperial Valley, believes farmers are dependent. Colorado River Shrinking More can be done to conserve water and use it more efficiently. So he installed water sensors and monitors on almost two-thirds of his 3,000-acre land to prevent waste.
But one of Brandy’s off-limits practices is fallow. It’s about leaving fields unplanted to save water that would otherwise irrigate the crops. Brandy said that would save a lot of water, but it would also financially threaten both farmers and rural communities.
“It’s not very productive because it just doesn’t farm,” Brandy said.
Many Western farmers feel the same way. increasingly desperate drought in the west The Colorado River serves 40 million people.
“Given the amount of water used for agriculture in the Colorado River system, it cannot be stabilized without reducing agriculture,” said Tom Buschatzke, director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources. “It’s just math.”
Farmer Larry Cox walks through a plowed field with his dog Brody on his farm near Brawley, California, Monday, August 15, 2022. The Federal Reclamation Service is looking at fallow as a way to reduce water use. This means leaving farmland idle and paying key users to make it valuable. So farmers in the Imperial Valley of California and the Yuma Valley of Arizona are primarily looking at the possibilities. Many people are reluctant. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull).
Photo: ASSOCIATED PRESS/Gregory Bull
Alfalfa grows in a field on Tom Brandy’s farm walking near Calexico, California, Tuesday, February 28, 2023. Save water and use it more efficiently. But one of his off-limits practices for Brandy is fallow. It’s about leaving fields unplanted to save water that would otherwise irrigate the crops. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)
Photo: ASSOCIATED PRESS/Gregory Bull
The U.S. Reclamation Service is considering paying farmers to rest their fields. Many of them are in California’s vast Imperial Valley and Arizona’s Yuma County, where they grow much of the country’s winter vegetables and rely on rivers. comes from $4 billion set aside for
Federal officials and major irrigators have been in negotiations for months. Neither side has disclosed details of the negotiations, nor how much funding is being sought or provided.
Sen. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat from Colorado, said fallow should be considered. The challenge, he said, is to come up with fair pay for farmers as they work on land of varying quality and plant crops of varying value.
“Water in certain areas of the Colorado River Basin is more valuable than water in others. have to deal with,” Hickenlooper said in an interview.
Agriculture uses 70% to 80% of the Colorado River’s water, and ideas for reducing it have long been debated. Farmers and the irrigators who serve them justify their use of water because people across the country eat locally grown produce and locally grown grass-fed beef. said.
Water officials in cities and other states where demand from farms is low say agriculture draws so much water from rivers that wasteful farming practices continue despite water shortages. says there is. They say that even as major reservoirs supplied from Colorado plummet to all-time lows, western water laws that prioritize older users will keep farmers with those rights thirsty in the converted desert. He said he could grow crops.
Tina Shields is a water manager at the Imperial Irrigation District, first saving water with efficient methods such as drip irrigation, selecting crops that use less water, and using water sensors to reduce waste. I advise farmers to do so. But she acknowledged that fallow must be part of the equation as states heed the government’s call. to the federal government Reduce usage by 15% to 30%.
“As much as we don’t like fallow,” Shields jokes, joking that the practice is known as “the F-word here,” the district’s additional 250,000 acre-feet It said it would need some amount to conserve water from the Colorado River, which it said would save about 8% of the allocation from the Colorado River. (One acre-foot of water is enough to submerge one acre of land in one foot of water, roughly the amount used by two to three U.S. households annually.)
Resting fields to conserve water is not a new idea in the Imperial Valley.
The Imperial Irrigation District has had a fallow program for 15 years. historic water transfer agreements Logging took place in 2003 to and from San Diego. The program he finished in 2017. About 300,000 acres of farmland fellow, 1.8 million acre-feet of water was saved, and he spent $161 million to pay farmers.
Things are getting worse on the Colorado River, but the Imperial Valley has memories of the program. And farmers want much more than they were paid at the time.
Larry Cox, who has grown crops and grasses in the Imperial Valley for decades, said hundreds of the 4,000 acres were nomadic at the time. He used the payment to buy sprinklers his pipes and other equipment to make the irrigation system more efficient. But he also let go of his 5% to his 10% of the workforce of irrigators, farm workers and tractor drivers.
Today, he worries about the impact fallow will have on rural communities. In addition to potentially causing economic losses to farmers, businesses that supply farmers with tires, fertilizers, gas and other needs will also be affected.
“It damages our entire community,” he said.
Many farmers fear that once the land is no longer produced, it will never be cultivated again. This is also because the quality of the land may deteriorate, making it difficult to return the land to production later.
Paul Brierley, executive director of the University of Arizona’s Yuma Center of Excellence for Desert Aggregation, said disruptions to farm operations have consequences downstream.
“Farming is like any other business,” Brierley said. “They have capital invested, they have employees, they have markets for their products.
The failure of a proposal from a Yuma County farmer last year showed how difficult it would be for federal officials and the farmers they target to come to an agreement. In that case, the farmer suggested the government pay him about $1,500 for each acre-foot of unused water in his four years, but no deal came to fruition.
An indication of how much reclamation would pay came from another offer offered at $400 per acre-foot to farmers in the lower basins of Arizona, California, and Nevada.
Buschatzke said Arizona farmers felt that even the $1,500 offer was less than they deserved based on what they made with their produce.
“It’s a business, sure, but they think they’re doing a lot of good for the whole country because they grew up in Yuma,” Buschatzke said.
Imperial Valley farmers hold superior rights to the waters of the Colorado River, making it almost impossible to mandate a water cut there without filing a lawsuit.
“You can’t get producers on board,” says Shields. “We have to make business decisions for them.”
___
Associated Press reporter Sam Metz contributed from Salt Lake City.
___
The Associated Press is supported by The Walton Family Foundation for its coverage of water and environmental policy. AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental protection coverage, please visit: https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment
Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
