Regarding the May 7th letter, Gun Murder and Mental Health.

While I agree that guns kill people, more so in the US than in Europe, the majority of Europeans are well-educated and their parents are more concerned about their children’s behavior. It is a fact. And there will be fewer children without parents to guide them. Europe has strict gun laws, but the United States has very lax ones.

I believe the Democratic Awakening policy is racist and discriminatory. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies are now being adopted and implemented by federal, state, and local governments, educational institutions, aka liberal enlightened institutions, and businesses across the United States. All in the name of racial, social and economic justice.

All of this, I believe, leads to racism and discrimination against white people, especially heterosexual white men. Anti-whiteness is at the heart of the critical racial theory taught to young students across America. Awakened his DEI training sessions for government and private industry employees are basically anti-white men.

If the government or the private sector is faced with a choice between recruiting well-qualified white male applicants or recruiting well-qualified or lesser minority applicants, the government Or will the private sector’s DEI policy dictate adoption of the latter? The DEI policy of the Awakened Democrats amounts to affirmative action on steroids. For decades, America has spent hundreds of billions of taxpayer money on affirmative action policies for minorities. Now Democrats are taking it to the next discriminatory level.

Regarding the letter of May 7 “Budget Limits”.

The letter read: Parents get mad when dads send their kids to college with a $5,000 year-round credit card for necessities, and the card is maxed out in the first month. Of course! So what do fathers do? The writer of the letter admitted to paying the bills first and then imposing a tight budget on the students.

In a national comparison, the writer of the letter says this is exactly what Kevin McCarthy did, but it’s not. He (Congress) refuses to pay the bill before the cuts are made. In other words, his father has no intention of jeopardizing his good credit and is willing to pay reluctantly, but Congress intends to ruin the credit of this great nation by prioritizing the future over the past. . TRUE?

Why would an eligible US citizen want to own an AR-15 style rifle? Why aren’t other gun options good enough to protect yourself? And the original weapon was intended for warfare. The paramedic doctor described the damage to the human body in terms suggesting that a “simple” 45-caliber wound might be repairable, but not flesh or bone. Some voters allow a single topic to determine their vote. Abortion, for example.

For me personally, I decided that this subject of whether or not to allow possession of the fearsome AR-15 style weapon deserved to determine my election vote. My idea is to outlaw such weapons and allow our government to buy all existing AR-15 style weapons, including ammunition, from their public owners at a fair price, and have them already used for that purpose. To transport them all to the Ukrainian government using the allocated funds. .

As a voter in CD6, Arizona, I am appalled and appalled to read several letters recently issued by Rep. This is clearly a coordinated effort by the Democrats to tarnish the reputation of the honorable congressman who is the father, her husband and the servant of the constituency’s people.

Moreover, the out-of-state left-wing PAC’s paid out-of-state attack ads already airing on local television are frankly deceptive.

He is a strong supporter of Republican values ​​of personal responsibility, fiscal responsibility, border security, national defense, and constitutional compliance.

I know Juan and Laura personally and professionally. No one is better than those who walk this earth. I am honored to call them friends and to have Juan welcome me and my family to the United States House of Representatives.

Regarding the May 7 article, “UA Leadership Realignment Expected to Improve Campus Safety”.

This article seemed detailed and comprehensive. Of course, I don’t know all the details of the university’s safety protocol investigation. However, as UA President Dr. Robert C. Robbins has suggested, organizational change may not be the perfect solution.

The fired Governor of Liesle Forks and UA Police Chief Paula Barrafus appear to be scapegoats for supervisory staff neglect. Resigning Robbins and the other chain of command managers may be a better solution than throwing just two lower-level personnel under the bus.

Widespread coverage in recent weeks suggests that the University General Counsel, Kendall Washington White, Dean of Student Affairs, and the Pima County Attorney’s Office should also take some responsibility for safety negligence.

Re: May 3rd article “First 100 days”.

For all those pissed off about how Republican Congressman Juan Ciscomani voted in his first 100 days, we have some news. He is a Republican and is active in his own party.

Regarding the article on May 8, “Courts Get Deserved Consequences as Public Support Plunges”.

We must ask ourselves: Do we, the people, deserve what we are getting? But what would happen if at least five of the judges lied to get the job?

John Roberts claimed he was merely the “referee” making the decisions, but had no opinion on Roe vs. Wade. Alito said he would follow precedent. they lied. They were ideologues from the beginning.

Then there are Gorsuch and Connie Barrett, who argued that precedent should not be touched. Kavanaugh blatantly lied when Senator Susan Collins asked directly for her views on Law. Clarence Thomas is a piece of himself, and Joe Biden can rightly be blamed for Thomas standing in court, as Biden has swept all of Thomas’ scandalous wrongdoings under the proverbial rug .

The real question is, are Americans entitled to courts making ideological decisions that are not based on law?