The Supreme Court will soon announce whether it will hear cases that could undermine the Democratic wealth tax plan and other proposals to tax income before it is received.
Mr and Mrs Washington Kathleen and Charles Moore sued In 2019, it sought a refund of $14,729 in taxes levied on small investments in foreign companies from the government, but received no benefit. according to in court documents. The couple had stuck with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 after Congress passed it to offset other taxes. changeincludes one-time tax It applies to shareholders who own 10% of the shares of a foreign company that have earned a profit, even if they have not received the profit.
The couple’s lawsuit is at the core of questions under many “wealth taxes” proposed by Democrats to tax unrealized income. That is, whether the “Sixteenth Amendment, which gives Congress the power to tax income without apportionment,” applies. Across multiple states, Congress can impose taxes on income before it is received. If the Supreme Court rules that Congress cannot tax unrealized income, the legal basis for the wealth tax would be undermined.
Hank Adler, Chapman University’s barra accounting professor, called the Moores’ case “the most important tax case in nearly 100 years.”
If the judge doesn’t take up the case, “there will be an opportunity for Congress to pass a value tax or a wealth tax,” Adler told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Then, if the case were brought to the Ninth Circuit, it would start the court system over, knowing that a court would rule that the thanks tax was constitutional.”
Policies such as President Joe Biden’s proposed tax on unrealized gains and Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden’s tax proposals a year Attorneys for the Moores argue that profits in tradable assets such as stocks require an answer to this question. petition.
“There are good reasons for the Court to settle the vital constitutional question of realization, now that the Court’s rulings have informed lawmakers and are in a position to avoid major constitutional conflicts in the future,” the lawyers said. said in a petition to the Supreme Court.
Earlier, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the tax and upheld a lower court’s ruling that rejected the Moores’ retrial before this court, but the judges who dissented the ruling said that “It was the first court in the country to state that it was an ‘income tax,'” he said. The Moores filed a petition with the Supreme Court in February, which the judges considered last week and again on Thursday.
“The Moores are facing income tax on income they didn’t receive,” Dan Greenberg, general counsel for the Association of Competitive Businesses, which represents the Moores, told DCNF. “That’s not what an income tax should be.”
Leaving the Ninth Circuit’s decision untouched would not necessarily give a “green light” to a wealth tax proposal that would end future legal challenges, but the Ninth Circuit’s decision puts the issue in a highly uncertain position. Showing a “yellow flag” for such policies to remain in place, Eric S. Jaffe, a partner at Scherr Jaffe and adjunct researcher in legal studies at the Pacific Institute, told DCNF.
“As anyone who drives in New York or Washington, D.C. knows, a yellow light often means go,” he says. (Related: Biden Calls for ‘Minimum Tax’ on Billionaires)
The U.S. Supreme Court will open in Washington, D.C. on June 16, 2023. The court is expected to rule on some of the cases contested this term. (Photo credit: SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)
An update on whether the lawsuit will go to trial is expected on Monday.
Greenberg said the Ninth Circuit’s ruling “runs counter to the way tax law has been interpreted and understood over the past century,” adding that it “contradicts the way other assets have increased in value but not generated income. It opens the door to taxation,” he said.
All content produced by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent, nonpartisan news distribution service, is available free of charge to legitimate news publishers capable of serving large audiences. All reissues must include our company logo, press byline, and DCNF affiliation. If you have any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact us at licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
