Religious groups have supported calls for the Supreme Court to overturn precedents that respect government agencies’ interpretation of the law, citing a nearly 40-year-old ruling that sparked disputes between several church-states. ing.
The Supreme Court will consider case The forthcoming Roper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo challenges “respect for the chevron,” a jurisprudence rooted in 1984 case law that instructs courts to follow an executive branch’s interpretation of law when the wording is ambiguous. be. The Roper Bright case stems from a family-owned fishing company’s fight against government agencies demanding state-mandated pay for onboard lifeguards. Amount of money Julie Blake, a senior adviser to the Alliance to Defend Freedom, told the Daily Caller News Foundation that more than economic prosperity was at stake.
“In addition to threatening economic prosperity, the executive branch is threatening the most important issues for ordinary Americans: the right to life, the biological differences between men and women, the right to religious liberty, the right to free speech, and the right to parenthood. It’s threatening the rights of people,” Blake told DCNF. “In this case, restraining the executive state would protect the liberties of all Americans by respecting the separation of powers.”
Critics of this doctrine argue that it empowers federal agencies by allowing them to enforce broad interpretations of certain statutes.Pacific Law Foundation Attorney Addie Diner put itChevron’s homage “puts a thumbs up on the scales of justice at the expense of the American people facing federal agencies in court,” allowing agencies to avoid checks and balances from the judiciary over their actions. I have to.
The ADF filed a brief for the case this week on behalf of the Christian Employers’ Union, arguing that referral to government agencies threatens the separation of powers in ways that violate the fundamental freedoms of Americans.
The CEA cites instances of government agencies citing Chevron to justify policies that raise concerns about religious freedom. Interpret Section 1557 of the Affordable Medical Expenses Act prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and requires doctors to perform gender reassignment procedures.
when challengedThe CEA notes that HHS “claimed respect for Chevron in its attempt to defend its reinterpretation of Section 1557 from direct examination.”
“This interpretation has been rejected by some courts as being contrary to statute,” the brief said. “However, other courts have issued injunctions against this obligation under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act rather than finding that HHS has no statutory authority, but in the absence of impending Chevron analysis. If the statutory issues were properly resolved, this order would be superfluous.” (Related: ‘Safe against Tyranny’: House considers SCOTUS investigator’s limits)
Fishermen file Supreme Court briefs to challenge Chevron rulinghttps://t.co/tn6SCJla9B pic.twitter.com/PJNahgXqUP
— action cause instance (@CauseofActionDC) July 17, 2023
Blake told the DCNF that one of the most “evil examples” of Chevron’s respect is how the Biden administration is using it. directly family planning funds abortion clinic.
“Under the Biden administration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) successfully invoked chevrons to block judicial review of its decision to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in Title X family planning funds to abortion clinics.” explains the brief. “But in Chevron’s case, HHS would never have tried to change Title X’s requirements and would have never filed a lawsuit.”
Supported by the Beckett Foundation for Religious Freedom, Little sister especially poor people who have assumed Obamacare contraceptive obligations, won Their case was filed in the Supreme Court in 2016. simply this week.
“The common thread across more than a decade of regulation and litigation is that federal regulators have been politically and ideologically motivated to downplay unpopular religious groups at every turn,” the memorandum asserts. “Each loss in this court was met not with connivance but with more aggressive regulatory creativity.”
“Abolishing rules of judicial respect that tend to encourage administrative excesses is itself a good thing,” writes Little Sisters of the Poor. “But since most recent religious liberty disputes stem from regulators rather than parliaments, eliminating unwarranted respect will also reduce future conflicts between church-states.”
Religious groups aren’t the only ones with a vested interest in overthrowing the Chevron government. number two fix Advocate, US Chamber of Commerce commercial27 state Attorney General, 36 member The Congressional and House bipartisan legal advisory groups are among the 171 parties that have filed briefs in support of reconsidering Chevron’s respect.
“Federal regulations affect everyone’s lives,” Ryan Mulvey, an attorney at the Institute for Action and co-counsel with the fishermen who filed the lawsuit, said in a statement. “And everyone has the potential to be adversely affected by the denial of a fair hearing because of illegal government overreach and chevrons.”
“The number of court filings reflects a broader interest in overthrowing Chevron and ending unchecked power in the hands of government bureaucrats,” Mulvey continued.
All content produced by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent, non-partisan news distribution service, is available free of charge to legitimate news publishers capable of serving large audiences. All reissues must include our company logo, press byline, and DCNF affiliation. If you have any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact us at licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
