The beauty of America is that you can earn a lot of money and do whatever you want with it. But if out of all possibilities you choose to give to Harvard, I would question your motives.
It's something like this: Imagine you have been selected for a bizarre reality show competition. Each contestant is given a budget of $1 million to cause as much damage as possible to the United States. Whoever can mess up the country in the most cost-effective way wins.
Options abound:
It might be a good idea to buy up a lot of fentanyl and give it away for free.according to one studyIt is available wholesale for about $140 per gram. enough to kill Approximately 500 people. That means 500 adults. If you hand it out at your local elementary school, you might get double that. Tell them it's candy. (Related: China continues to avoid responsibility for US fentanyl supply ahead of high-level talks with US)
You can also borrow a wrecking ball to destroy some border walls, but it seems like no one can cross without needing help.
You may also want to browse the Amazon wishlists of various Islamic terrorist groups. RPGs are probably not in your price range, but every bullet helps. And they are always happy to accept used Toyota pickups.
But if you really want to maximize your ROI, you need to think about the big picture. In fact, there are ways to increase instability and distress across multiple indicators simultaneously. More climate change, lower birth rates, more illegal immigration, more wars, more terrorism, less wealth, and less freedom are all possibilities.
And all you have to do is donate to Harvard University.
For those keeping to themselves, this is the fourth research fraud scandal at Harvard in the past month.
– Claudine Gay resigned on January 2nd after it was discovered that half of her work contained plagiarized material.
-A few weeks later, Dana-Farber at Harvard University Teaching Hospitals recanted… https://t.co/mtb9TbM6II— Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) February 1, 2024
If you want to kill as many bald eagles as possible with one stone, there's no better option. But don't just take my word for it. Look at the billionaires who figured out the same hack. leslie wexner, Len Blavatnik and ken griffindonated $300 million to schools in April. (Related: 'Everyone's concerned': Harvard University worries about losing more longtime donors after response to Hamas attack)
Indeed, all three schools have severed ties with Harvard over its tolerance of anti-Semitism. griffin said University students were so “caught up in the rhetoric of oppressors and oppressed” that they became “whining snowflakes.” He also said he would not resume giving until Harvard was “clear about resuming its role” in educating “America's young men and women” to become leaders.
But come on. That's not what he meant. It's just PR damage control. Either that, or these billionaires are a bunch of narcissistic idiots. And that can't happen, right?
Guys like Griffin are smart enough to figure that out. The purpose of a system is what it doesthat what Harvard is doing is destroying America, and that Harvard accomplishes that goal precisely by preparing “young American men and women” to lead us straight over a cliff.
I'm sure he thinks his $300 million is nothing but disrespecting American history, he needs to see a therapist for his climate anxiety, and punish the rest of us to assuage it, America. knew that it would be used to create a generation of elites who would only despise history. He values skin color over merit (or basic honesty), transsexuals his 1.2 children in pursuit of influence, promotes decriminalization policies without facing the consequences, and holds borders. I think that is bad, but genocide of the jews It is the height of virtue.
Data is easily accessible.According to someone recent research, 89% of Ivy League graduates support “strict rationing of gas, meat, and electricity to combat climate change.” Seventy-one percent of voters believe parents should have no say in their children's education, compared to just 38% of voters overall.
Although a majority of American voters oppose it, 89% of Ivy League graduates support “strict rationing of meat, electricity, and gas to combat climate change.” pic.twitter.com/UJE6jRfGjQ
— Rob Henderson (@robkhenderson) January 29, 2024
They believe everything they hear from the government and mainstream media and think you have too much freedom. And of course, they are getting much wealthier while others are going bankrupt or barely keeping up with inflation. (Related: The 'smartest' people in America are basically all totalitarian psychopaths, study finds)
The only explanation for funding universities that produce graduates like this is that those funders are committed to destroying this country as quickly and efficiently as possible.
What other reasons could there be? Griffin and other billionaires must have known what kind of organizations they were supporting. No one smart enough to make that much money would waste hundreds of millions of dollars without doing their due diligence. You don't even need to dig that deep. Try skimming the headlines from time to time.
The only other explanation is that Griffin was so ego-blind and status-obsessed that he didn't care about funding neo-Marxist indoctrination camps as long as the building had his name on it. about it.
Ken Griffin can't be that stupid. right?
Grayson Key is the editor of the Daily Caller.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.