The Washington state consulting giant faces an existential threat that the Trump administration has been “strengthened by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

The federal government spends hundreds of millions of millions of years on consulting companies that provide everything from infrastructure to policy analysis and management support. This is deeply embedded in Washington’s business. The Trump administration’s recent review of contracts and potentially termination threatens to overturn that system, forces agencies to justify outsourcing decisions and place companies relying on federal dollars that rely on serious risks.

Contractors have warned that future cuts could disrupt important government functions, but Doge supporters see them as long-term revisions to wasted spending.

“The question is not what’s there for taxpayers or what’s there for people who work for or provide services,” Thomas Schatz, the citizens’ president of government waste, a nonprofit watchdog group, told the Daily Callenor News Foundation. “Taxpayers’ payments. Taxpayers are funding the government, and what Doge is trying to do is make sure the money is spent effectively.” (Related: “Group Celebration”: DOD Contractors Press “Climate Action” with ORGs that try to refund US troops)

Doge now saves taxpayers over $1 billion in crazy DEI contracts https://t.co/p81lgrkeov

– Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2025

Last week, panic was set up across Washington’s consulting classes after the General Services Agency (GSA) issued the directive. Notes, Get According to the Wall Street Journal, we will be scrutinizing 10 top-paid consulting companies, including Booz Allen Hamilton, Deloitte, Guidehouse, IBM and more.

The move sent executives scrambling. Recently, leaders of Ernst & Young & Guidehouse’s top consulting firms have called for an urgent meeting with Federal Acquisition Services Commissioner Josh Grundbaum, and have discussed outlets individually to assert their continued role in government operations. It has been reported Sunday. Booz Allen executives are reportedly in contact with Gruenbaum. As Musk and Trump move to federal dollar spigot, they highlight the growing unrest in the industry.

“The government has grown dramatically,” Schatz points out, noting that it has recorded federal spending in recent years. In fact, total federal spending surged at around $2 trillion between 2019 and 2023, rising to about $2 trillion higher than before the Covid-19 pandemic. According to Go to Kato Research Institute.

The contracted services were the major growth areas of its spending. Federal agencies spent $478 billion in services (from management consulting to IT support) in 2023, compared to GAO’s tangible product, $281 billion. It has been reported – A steady increase in services that have been signed over the past 20 years. The Pentagon accounts for almost half of these service contracts, accounting for around $230 billion that year. (Related: “The Power of Supergenius”: Doge reportedly knocks on the IRS door)

Booz Allen alone generates 98% of annual revenues from US government contracts, including approximately $11 billion. According to Since the SEC application and Trump’s victory in November, the company’s stock price has plummeted by more than 30%. Similar concerns are spreading through other contractors – Raidos They receive 87% of revenue from government contracts, but other companies Accentureisolated from existential dangers by a diverse client base.

#boozallen CEO Horacio Rozanski participated @cnbcclosingbell To discuss why speed is the most important factor in American national security and how Allen is building, partnering and investing in advanced technology to achieve results. https://t.co/wvd6cxaovj

– Boozallen Hamilton (@boozallen) February 5th, 2025

Despite obvious consultant stress, Schatz argued that cutting these contracts might not be as simple as it looks.

“We don’t know, taxpayers don’t know. There’s no single place to make that decision,” he said. Until Doge built such a system, he said the agency relies on fragmented records to justify or terminate the contract.

Legal barriers can also complicate the administration’s efforts to cancel contracts entirely.

“Whether or not you can cancel a contract depends on the terms of the contract,” Schatz said. “Under the 1974 Budget Act, the president cannot cancel the money allocated by Congress. Only Congress can cancel that money.”

Despite the looming consulting crisis, Booz Allen’s leadership claims he can survive the storm. CEO Horacio Rozanski said the company has withstanded many presidential transitions and its work coincides with the Trump administration’s priorities, but he acknowledged the possibility of “disturbance.” (Related: “The Power of Supergenius”: Doge reportedly knocks on the IRS door)

“We recognize that there may be some disruption in the market in the short term, but in the long term we are very well aligned,” Rosansky said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. He argued that if Washington wants to run with federal employees, it “needs to operate with functional technology.” And ours works. ”

Similarly, IBM (another company selected by the GSA) defended federal services as important to make government more efficient. Company Public Relations Officer I said The federal news network has said that IBM has helped the agency “Streamline operations, increase efficiency and bring about better benefits for taxpayer dollars.”

However, the Trump administration doesn’t seem to think all such contracts are worth it. Last week’s GSA reportedly directed the agency to show why each consulting agreement is not only valuable, but also “mission-critical.” What exactly counts as “mission critical” remains an open question that puts the contractor in the upper hand.

“There are a lot of questions,” Stan Soloway, former chairman of the Professional Services Council, told The Wall Street Journal. He said businesses are in a hurry to meet with White House officials and assert the value of their services. “Many of these companies are doing serious technical work. Now they don’t even know what the next six months or year will be. Nothing interferes with the market more than uncertainty.”

Historical similarities are not lost in spending watchdogs. Schatz pointed out that President Ronald Reagan’s 1984 Grace Commission, the final comprehensive private sector review of the federal operation. He explained that Reagan implemented many of his recommendations, achieving more than $100 billion in savings, and the committee ultimately led to lasting reforms, such as the creation of the agency’s chief financial officer. Government citizens against waste – Schatz’s lead group – was established in the aftermath of the Grace Commission to promote the implementation of similar measures.

After spending 40 years without a thorough federal spending review, Schatz considers Musk’s Doge to be the successor to the Grace Commission. “It’s been a long time since this happens again,” he said. From his point of view, Trump and Musk are forcing the agency to justify each outsourcing project, hoping that they can cut bloated government fat.

“From a broader perspective… this is a long postponed effort,” Schatz said.

Officials from Booz Allen Hamilton, Ernst & Young, Guidehouse, IBM and GSA did not respond to DCNF requests for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan newswire service that is free to use for legitimate news publishers that can provide large audiences. All republished articles must include logos, reporter signatures and DCNF affiliation. For questions regarding our guidelines or partnerships with us, please contact Licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.