Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett, a Democrat, expressed concerns in an interview on Thursday about the potential dangers of reducing funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), suggesting that such cuts could set the stage for another attack similar to 9/11.
Crockett’s comments came in light of an executive order from President Trump issued in January, which aimed to freeze foreign aid. She pointed out that USAID finances various projects, including those related to LGBTQ+ issues in places like Peru and Vietnam. During a podcast with Jamal Bryant called “Let’s Be Clear,” Crockett argued that slashing USAID funds could ultimately lead to a resurgence in terrorism.
“People often focus solely on the money going abroad, but they overlook that one reason planes aren’t flying into U.S. buildings is our soft power,” Crockett stated. “It’s about diplomacy and building relationships, making other nations view Americans positively. For instance, when we fund healthcare initiatives there, it enhances our safety at home.”
Crockett criticized the way some in power divert attention from these crucial issues.
“They have a knack for convincing us that it’s all about money being allocated here or there,” she remarked. “It’s frustrating. If we were to see every penny spent in our bank account, it would seem like a lot, right? Yet, they want us distracted by that while ignoring the larger budget.”
She also compared funding for foreign aid to military expenditure, highlighting a significant rise in defense spending while ICE agents reportedly receive lavish bonuses, all while essential social support is stripped away from struggling Americans.
“Both Eron [Elon Musk] and Trump seemed to touch on some truths during their recent back-and-forth. Suddenly, amidst the drama, Trump suggests trimming some defense contracts,” she noted. “We’re shelling out vast sums—over a trillion dollars—while ICE agents can draw bonuses of around $42,000 for doing what? It just doesn’t add up.”
However, Crockett’s claim regarding the $42,000 bonuses for ICE agents points to broader discussions about new legislations. The “Big Beautiful Bill,” enacted on July 4th, allows for significant funding for the agency, including $8 billion to hire new personnel over several years.
Crockett cautioned against falling for divisive political strategies, urging the audience to see beyond single issues and understand the wider implications.
“Let’s not let them manipulate us. I don’t care what views you hold on LGBTQIA rights, abortion, or immigration,” she emphasized. “You might think, ‘Sure, let’s get them out,’ but in the process, you risk losing what you have yourself as other stakeholders get affected.”
“Our fates are intertwined, and while I do care about these issues, my aim isn’t to sway anyone’s opinion—just to spark awareness.”
However, it’s worth noting that there’s little evidence to support Crockett’s assertion that cutting USAID could lead to another 9/11. Recent reports indicate that USAID’s budget constitutes just 0.3% of the federal spending, suggesting that any cuts would likely have minimal effects on national security.
