Breaking News Stories

Brigadier General John Teichert: Responsibility for the Tragedy in Afghanistan

Reflections on the U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan

August marks a solemn fourth anniversary since the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, which many view as a considerable failure under President Joe Biden. On August 15, 2021, the Taliban took control of Kabul, leading to tragic events like the loss of thirteen soldiers at Abbey Gate on August 26. By the end of that month, the last American troops departed, encapsulating a noticeable low point for U.S. strength and credibility, reminiscent of the withdrawal from Vietnam decades earlier.

The situation in August 2021 represented one of the most significant operational failures for the U.S. in years. It not only painted a picture of incompetence but also gave adversaries a chance to exploit perceived weakness, leading to serious geopolitical consequences, including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Hamas’ attack on Israel. With the air of American fragility, various global players seemed poised to fill the emerging void.

Former President Donald Trump and Secretary Pete Hegseth emphasized the need for accountability during this tumultuous period. Their leadership brought attention to the circumstances surrounding the U.S. exit, and as the anniversary approaches, there’s a palpable expectation from the public for transparency regarding their findings. I think this moment offers a fitting opportunity for the administration to reflect and provide some closure on this challenging chapter in American history.

It’s worth noting that voters have already expressed their dissatisfaction with President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, and it’s likely that the ramifications of this withdrawal will be felt in the upcoming 2024 election. Concerns about leadership appear justified; many feel the trust in our leaders isn’t easily repairable after such a significant misstep.

Interestingly, two key military figures involved in the withdrawal—Chairman Mike Milley and U.S. Central Commander Frank McKenzie—have since retired, which perhaps allows the military to distance itself from this operational blunder. Yet, many other senior officers who played significant roles during this time still remain, and their accountability seems somewhat elusive.

There are crucial aspects regarding the withdrawal that still invite scrutiny. Decisions about both the timing and method of the exit were tightly controlled by U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), leaving little room for alternative viewpoints from those on the ground in Afghanistan. While direct communication with the President might have been limited, the operational decisions made by CENTCOM were integral to how the withdrawal unfolded.

The leadership within CENTCOM, responsible for strategy and military advice, fell short of the expectations set by previous military leaders. This failure was starkly evident and, unfortunately, sends a disheartening message to those who sacrificed their lives in Afghanistan. Many will likely find it unsettling that the very officers who led the botched withdrawal have received promotions, indicating a troubling trend where subpar performance does not carry significant consequences.

As the anniversary of this withdrawal looms, the same military leaders continue to chart national security strategies, which some argue only adds to the shame of the situation. Without accountability or introspection, the legacy of this withdrawal will perhaps forever be overshadowed by the question of how we allowed such a misstep to occur in the first place.