For a long time, the United States has poured taxpayers into media businesses around the world. Do you make the United States safer under Trump’s guidance principles? Does it strengthen the United States? Does it make the United States more prosperous? -The time has come to an end to the media subsidies that do not match these purposes after seeing these financing decisions.
The U.S. government for a long time US Global Media Organization (USAGM)I will supervise such outlet Voice of America (VOA),, Radio -free Europe/Radiolibatty (RFE/RL)And others.
These outlets were originally designed as American soft power tools, promoting democratic value and opposing authoritative propaganda. However, in recent years, they have been increasingly drifting from their mission and often match the story of US foreign policies and domestic interests. This misuse of American resources must end.
One of the obvious issues is a method that supports the story of the United States that does not match the US strategic interests. Instead of strengthening US leadership, these entities have often provided a platform of publicly and critical voices in American policies and value.
There were many cases where these outlets amplified anti -American perspectives, weakened US reliability overseas, and could not defend the basic US principles. If the media strategy provided by American taxpayers is not explicitly working on the United States’ strength, safety, and prosperity, why are we continuing to bank all?
Furthermore, the funding of the global media business has changed to a blank check for liberal ideology. Outlet funded by these taxpayers frequently pushes a story that matches the global and advanced agenda rather than a policy that is useful for the United States.
They give priority to hard security issues, economic stability, projection of American power, but also the politics of identity, the extreme of climate, and social justice. This led to the situation where American citizens were unconsciously raising funds to content that directly contradicted their value and political beliefs.
Think of an example of Radio -free European/radial bati, which used to work as a critical voice of Soviet Communism, but is now a hub for European liberal activities.
Instead of rising authoritarianism and anti -American emotions, these outlet often criticize US allies in accordance with Trump’s vision for strong state sovereignty, giving excessive reliability to overseas left -wing movements. Masu. This type of media does not make the United States safer, stronger, or more prosperous. It does the opposite.
Even in Japan, the U.S. government supports Trump’s first philosophy in the United States.
National Public Radio (NPR) and Public BroadCasting Service (PBS) Receive the government’s large amount of money and consistently push hostile content for conservative value and the Trump era policy.
In March 2024, a Senator’s Supercoming Group proposed $ 575 million to the federal government. Funds Corporation for public broadcasting (CPB) that provides funds to PBS and NPRs. Why do American taxpayers need to provide funds to media institutions that will actively oppose half the government and impair the officially selected government?
On the other hand, it has a US global media organization (USAGM). request The tremendous $ 950 million in the 2025 budget -7.4 % increased from 2023. In USAGM, Voice of America (VOA) is operated by an annual budget of about $ 267.5 million in FY2023. These numbers emphasize a huge amount of taxpayers. Money is poured into global media organizations, and many of them are no longer useful for American strategic interests.
Redirecting these funds to the initiative that actually strengthens the strength of the United States is not only a financial order, but a strategic need. All dollars that have been wasted in the media that do not promote the United States are dollars that can be used to strengthen the army, secure borders, and revitalize the American industry.
In the era of great powers where enemies such as China and Russia have been influential through state -run media and digital propaganda, the United States has no room for funding to the media project that weakens his position on the global stage.
In addition, Trump has long understood that the media is a powerful weapon to form the people’s perception and strengthen the unification of the people. If the United States continues to be the leader in the free world, the media funds must guarantee that they will support institutions that will be clearly tackled for the prosperity of the United States and global control.
It means to block foreign interests, globalist ideology, or outlets immersed in left -wing activities. Instead, US media funds should be guided to a platform that promotes policies that match the value of the United States, emphasize the achievements of the United States, and promote policies that match the Trump doctrine of strength, safety and economic success. is. Is it a common sense approach?
Congress must take immediate measures to re -evaluate and refund the global media program that does not meet the first standard of the United States. Policy proprieters need to introduce laws that strictly link media funds in the principles of security, strength and prosperity. Media organizations that do not actively contribute to these goals should not receive US taxes.
It is time for the United States to stop subsidizing media operations that are not useful for national interests. If the media entity makes the United States more secure, the United States is stronger, and the United States does not prosper, you should not receive one penny from Americans.
The Trump administration has set a media policy framework that prioritizes the greatness of the United States. Now, it’s time to pursue it and make it permanent.
Brian E. Rave is a Republican candidate of 25 Floridathh CEO of Congress and Henry Public Relations. He can find it on x @brewanleibfl。
The opinions and opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s views and do not reflect the official position of Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent non -party newswire service and can be used for a legitimate news publisher who can provide large -scale viewers. All reissued articles must include logo, reporter signature, and belongs to DCNF. For questions about our guidelines or tie -ups with our company, please contact Licensing@DailyCallNewsfoundation.org.
