The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear two cases, including a prolife group that challenged the law banning protests near abortion clinics on Monday, criticising from one of the court’s most conservative justice I urged him to.
court Rejected The challenge from the life of the Prolife Groups Coalition against the law in Carbondale, Illinois, prohibits advocacy for abortions within 100 feet of an abortion clinic without permission. Judge Clarence Thomas criticized the 2000 Hill vs Colorado law decision It was supported a Similar laws It is based on the “right to avoid unwelcome speeches” in certain circumstances.
“I would have used this opportunity to explicitly overturn Hill,” wrote Thomas, George HW Bush’s appointee, in opposition Monday. “For now, we’ll leave the lower courts and organize what remains from Hill’s reasoning while our constitutional rights rest on balance.”
Conservative Judge Samuel Alito joined Thomas on the opposition, but their conservative and liberal colleagues did not explain their reasoning, as often happens when the Supreme Court refuses to proceed did.
Thomas More Society, representing Union Life, said Carbondale’s laws “will fail constitutional scrutiny if they come to the Supreme Court.” press release. Coalition Life did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Today, the US Supreme Court refused to listen to our case – Colix Life vs Carbondale – challenges unconstitutional non-speech zone laws that limit life support sidewalk counseling and hills to court They called for the overturn of Colorado.
press release: https://t.co/r9hif9rwuh pic.twitter.com/3jbftoqken
– Thomas More Society (@thomasmoresoc) February 24, 2025
The court also rejected similar challenges from pro-life protesters against Englewood, New Jersey Ordinancethe current In factit says “no one” within 8 feet of the entrance to the abortion clinic, other than a client, worker or passerby. Thomas opposed the Allied Life incident in Carbondale, Illinois.
Carbondale Law Prohibition against abortion “bearing a leaflet or handbuilding, displaying a sign, or engaged in oral protest, education or counseling” within half a foot of 100 feet of the entrance door to a hospital, clinic or medical facility. It’s been done.
The city repealed the law in 2024, but it was in effect for more than a year, Thomas pointed out with sympathy for the first amended lawsuit of Living the Union.
“The newly enacted 100-foot buffer zone meant that the Union Life Counselor was forced to stand far from the person he wanted to talk to,” Thomas said. “In some cases, sidewalk counselors had nowhere to stand in the middle of a busy road, making intimate counseling activities virtually impossible.” (Related: DEMS Calls Proposed Optional Adoption Registry seeks “intrusion” for struggling mothers)
Thomas, the oldest judge in court today, opposed the 2000 Hill v. Colorado decision.
“Since then, many of us have described the decision as “absurd,” “false,” “false,” “false,” “long-term,” and “abnormal.”
Thomas argued that the majority of conservative courts had already undermined the hill precedent in 2022 with a ruling that there was no constitutional right to abort in the important Dobbs v. Jackson case.
“Even if the Hills are not completely eroded, they are seriously damaged and refusing to provide clarity is a waiver of our judicial obligation,” Thomas said.
The so-called buffer zone law restricts protests at abortion facilities. In fact In European countries that are not equivalent to America’s first amendment, it has led to prosecutions against speeches from life supporters.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan newswire service that is free to use for legitimate news publishers that can provide large audiences. All republished articles must include logos, reporter signatures and DCNF affiliation. For questions regarding our guidelines or partnerships with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
