Senator Shaheen’s Stance on Anti-War Movement
During a June interview, Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen from New Hampshire expressed her views on the notion of her party becoming an “anti-war party,” especially following the bombing of American military targets in Iran. The conversation referenced a statement from President Donald Trump urging a bipartisan response, which included Democratic representative Ro Khanna from California.
In a discussion with Politico’s Dasha Burns, Shaheen was asked about Khanna’s call for Democrats to adopt a more non-interventionist stance. Burns remarked that Khanna felt the party risked becoming overly militaristic. “This is an opportunity for Democrats,” Burns noted, pointing out that public sentiment indicated a desire for reduced military involvement. Many had voted for the President, attracted by his purported anti-war position.
Shaheen, however, quickly countered Khanna’s perspective. “No, I think Khanna is mistaken,” she stated firmly. “Foreign policy isn’t that straightforward. You can’t simply oppose all military actions, as they may align with American or global interests.” She emphasized the necessity of supporting Ukraine in its ongoing conflict with Russia, viewing it as crucial not just for deterrence but for international alliances and partnerships.
“It’s vital we project a strong message to both allies and adversaries,” Shaheen continued. “I’m not in favor of wars, but turning isolationist hasn’t served us well in the past. Just look at the early signs of World War II.”
In contrast, Trump had campaigned on resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict and claimed that a key aspect of his legacy would be promoting peace. While hostilities in Ukraine continue, he reportedly facilitated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Following a U.S. airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities, Iran retaliated by targeting an American base in Qatar, but fortunately, this did not result in casualties or further escalation.
