Vice President JD Vance explained the difference between denying access to media outlets and imprisoning people for speech in X’s Monday post to former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan. did.
Vance criticized European leaders about censorship and immigration while speaking at the Munich Security Conference on Friday. Hasan allegedly took him to X and questioned Vance against the Trump administration. Prohibited Associated Press from an Oval Office Surrounding Media Outlet decision Continuing to use the term “Gulf of Mexico” in relation to the waters of the “Gulf of Mexico” on January 20th. Presidential Order. (Related: “Deeply dangerous”: MSNBC host says that media needs to stop covering “both sides” of the issue)
“Hey @jdvanceI know you are busy lectures on Europeans with free speech, but have you seen this? “Hasan Posted See X’s Monday, Axios White House correspondent Marc Caputo on AP insufficient access.
Yes dummy. I think there is a difference between not giving reporters a seat in the WH Press Briefing Room and imprisoning people to discuss their opinions. The latter is a threat to freedom of speech, and the former is not. I hope it helps!
– jd vance (@jdvance) February 17, 2025
“Yes, dummy. I think there’s a difference between not giving reporters a seat in the WH Press Briefing Room and not jailing people to make their opinions arguably,” Vance said. I responded X. “The latter is a threat to freedom of speech, and the former is not. I hope it helps!”
During Friday speech In Munich, Vance denounced European leaders of “terrorizing” by voters and questioned the decision to negate Romanian presidential election. The Vice President also spoke directly to Britain and Germany over laws that would curb speeches that were considered “hate.”
National authorities have arrested citizens over allegations Voice violation He said he shared it online out loud. In such an example, there was a British veteran. Convicted Praying outside the abortion clinic in October 2024.
“When you see a high-ranking official who has been threatening to cancel elections and cancel others, you should ask if you are holding yourself to a reasonable high standard,” Vance said. “And we say ‘We ourselves’ because we fundamentally believe we’re on the same team. We have to do more than talk about democratic values. We must live them. ”
“In the living memories of many in this room, the Cold War positioned itself as a defender of democracy against the tyranny of this continent,” Vance continued. “Think of the side of the fight that censored dissidents, shutting down churches and canceling elections. Were they good guys? Certainly not.”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan newswire service that is free to use for legitimate news publishers that can provide large audiences. All republished articles must include logos, reporter signatures and DCNF affiliation. For questions regarding our guidelines or partnerships with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
