Just a century ago this year, the Supreme Court in its decision Piercev. Societyof Sisters, Recognizing the parents’ right to direct their child’s education, he writes “.[t]His fundamental theory of freedom excludes the general power of the state to standardize its children by all governments of this union. . . Children are more than just creatures of the nation. Today, as they did a century ago, parents rely on courts that serve as backstops against abusive government policies.
Sadly, some American courts have closed the doors of justice in the face of parents trying to prove their rights and their children. If you are called from Wisconsin Parents protecting our children. Eau Claire Regional School District In the 7th Circuit, parents instruct school officials to hide the “social gender transition” of children from their parents in federal courts of appeals with jurisdiction over cases occurring in Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana. He challenged the school district’s policies. As the school told employees, “Parents have no right to know their child’s identity. That knowledge must be acquired.”
Incredible, the 7th Circuit Found The harm to the parents in that case was merely speculative. Apparently, the plaintiff must harm the position of suing, so parents find out that their son’s school is helping him dress as a girl and put the girls’ toilets in before challenging the policy. You will have to wait until it is used for a month.
supreme court Selected Do not review the decision of the 7th Circuit in that case. Judge Samuel Alito wrote a brief dissent, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, and the harm to his parents was not speculative, and “some federal courts were particularly tempted to use the doctrine of Article III as a way to avoid controversy.” I explain that I’m succumbing. Constitutional questions.”
It is also not an isolated case of a judge eschewing gender ideological controversy. Courts of Appeals with jurisdiction in the 4th Circuit, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina have become the same Conclusion in John and Jane’s parents 1 vs. Montgomery County Board of Education. Ohio District Court did so same in DOEV. Pine-Richland School District.
The fundamental rights of parents to direct the development of children, and the rights of children to be free from the indoctrination of ideology by school officials, depend on the courts willing to protect those rights. So, advancing American freedoms will take on the Blake Warner challenge to the 11th Circuit Rules, which effectively requires the Supreme Court to hire lawyers before representing the child’s interests in the court. This is why we have submitted an outline of Amicus asking the Supreme Court. Specifically, people can bring their claims in court without a lawyer, and parents can sue on behalf of their children, but the 11th and other courts can have children without hiring lawyers I discovered that I could not sue on behalf of the Warner’s arguments have nothing to do with gender ideology, but his challenge to this rule is essential. His success is because parents who cannot afford a lawyer can still seek judicial protection against the rights of their children.
On January 29th, President Trump ordered, among other things, to order the removal of federal funds from schools engaged in the “social transition of minor students,” and to work with state and local officials. An executive order has been issued to direct it. “Enforce the law and submit appropriate action to school staff that “promote the social transition of minor students.” Trump’s order is important, but gender ideologues definitely make huge resistance They know they’re going to be on stage. Parents must be vigilant and the courts must start taking their claims seriously. The Supreme Court filed Warner’s lawsuit and commissioned lawyers. Parental rights must be established by defeating them.
Mark Wheat is the general advisor to advance American freedom.
The opinions and opinions expressed in this commentary are the views of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan newswire service that is free to use for legitimate news publishers that can provide large audiences. All republished articles must include logos, reporter signatures and DCNF affiliation. For questions regarding our guidelines or partnerships with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
