An article published in mid-February in New Scientist attempted to argue in favor of a more relaxed view of cannibalism.

yes, new scientists do Define It seems that there is nothing wrong with cannibalism, or eating other people, like you do. Apparently, on an ethical level, “cannibalism causes fewer problems than you might imagine.''

I wish I was joking, but New Scientist claims exactly this before blaming our aversion to the practices of “Western religious traditions” that recognize the human body as “the seat of the soul and soul.” Did. [having] A divine scent. The author, who wisely remains anonymous, argues that “early modern colonialism, when racist stereotypes of cannibals were invented to justify conquest,” influenced our perceptions. I thought that maybe there was a problem.

Is it time for a more nuanced view of the ultimate taboo, cannibalism? https://t.co/wRmiU8ZSrZ

— New Scientist (@newscientist) February 19, 2024

If you're not willing to eat human flesh, even though eating human remains, especially brains, can literally kill you, then you're a bigoted, stinking Christian racist. according to To today's MedicalNews, slate and a wealth of science the study? (Related: Dear Kay, I find Jeffrey Dahmer attractive. Is that normal?)

Listen, I'm all for eating your buddies in an apocalyptic situation. Gal must do what he has to do to survive the dystopian landscape. But claiming that eating others is a good idea and should become part of our normal social practices is completely messed up.