After the U.S. Census Bureau announced the first round of official population corrections for 2020 in January, many states and cities have responded to most of the counting problems and the funding shortfalls those accidents could cause. Still waiting for action.
The Census Bureau’s new amendments show changes approved under the Count Question Resolution process for areas within Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Tennessee, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Dreams Time/TNS
Early winners are areas that had obvious technical problems in the census. Due to mapping issues and uncertain boundaries, prisons in Arkansas, Georgia, and Tennessee were misplaced, and populations were mistakenly added to nearby areas.
For example, in Whiteville, Tennessee, nearly 2,000 returned to that number in 2020, a 75% increase from the census of 2,606 after the prison population was accidentally added from a nearby area. Timothy Kuhn, director of the Tennessee Data Center in Knoxville, said:
The boost will cost the town an estimated $167 per capita, or $327,000 annually, in annual state funds distributed based on population, according to State Data Sharing estimates.
People are also reading…
However, the largest cases in big cities are still pending, especially affecting areas with large populations of racial minorities.
The Census Bureau’s new amendments show changes approved under the Count Question Resolution process for areas within Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Tennessee, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Census Bureau records show 32 in the same state, as well as parts of California, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah Other changes are still under consideration, including Total cases filed so far.
Another 23 cases were submitted in a similar program for a number of institutions, including college dormitories and nursing homes, but their results have not yet been published.
Much like Yuma County, Arizona, chaos continues. There, the early results of the count correction show the town of Somerton gaining six.
But the city of Yuma was told only that seven of the 20 challenges had been approved. The city won’t discover it until 2024, said state demographer Jim Chang.
It’s typical of other communities disputing the number of census figures that have been approved but not yet published, said Terry Ann Lowenthal, a Connecticut-based census consultant.
“The Census Bureau needs to be more transparent about this,” said Lowenthal. “Local governments put a lot of effort into reviewing and compiling evidence about underestimation, and they are very frustrated when the answer is a written resolution that gives unexplained results.”
The Census Bureau declined to answer for the record, but pointed to public documents explaining why it withheld details in some previous tally reviews. This is to maintain a small area to protect privacy and confidentiality rules for individual institutions.
State and local governments have until June 30 to submit cases to the Counting Question Solving Program, or another program called the Post-Census Group Quarters Review, which reviews the counts of institutions such as prisons and college dormitories. there is.
Census takers faced considerable confusion over how to count people in facilities in the spring of 2020, at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, when many students went home and nursing homes stopped accepting visitors. bottom.
The largest cases in large cities such as Austin, Texas. Memphis, Tennessee. Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Tempe, Arizona is still pending. Milwaukee is seeking an increase of almost 16,000 people, a large part of the nearly 18,000 population decline recorded in 2020 compared to 2010.
The city has evidence to support claims that some housing units were missed and others were incorrectly listed as vacant, according to Jordan Primakow, Milwaukee’s senior government relations manager.
The city isn’t expected to be entirely successful — the Census Bureau’s challenge program doesn’t include reconsidering vacancy decisions — but it’s important to note the reasons for the underestimation anyway.
“The criteria they are willing to review are very narrow,” he said.
Primakow adds that undercounting problems are typical in urban areas with large minority populations, like Milwaukee, and the Census Bureau is encouraging people to submit information that will help future counts, even if current guidelines can’t fix it. encouraged each city.
In its 2022 report, the Census Bureau admitted that it undercounted Black residents by 3.3% and Latino residents by almost 5% in 2020.
“I’ll throw a lot of spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks,” he said. “We can’t keep saying, ‘I’m sorry, we underestimated minority groups again.’ At some point, we have to do something about it.”
States with the most multi-generational households
States with the most multi-generational households

Census Bureau data shows that millions of Americans now live for generations under one roof, and many are driven by one factor: money.
New Jersey Real Estate Network Surveys 2021 Census Bureau data Find out which states have the highest percentage of multi-generational households.
About 3.8% of U.S. households are “multigenerational,” defined by the Census Bureau as three or more generations living together in one home. The percentage is higher in states with higher costs of living, such as Hawaii, New Jersey, and California.
The total number of people living in multigenerational households has quadrupled since 1971 to reach about 60 million. Pew Research Center. why? Finances are the main factor, with 40% of his respondents citing cost as the main reason. Caregivers ranked her second, according to survey respondents. For that study, Pew Research defined “multigenerational” as “skipped generations,” where two or more adult generations live together, or where grandparents live with grandchildren under the age of 25. defined.
The strain caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the mix of multigenerational homebuyers, making living with an aging parent the best option for some families.of National Real Estate Association Nearly 30% of multi-generational homebuyers cite “health/care for elderly parents/relatives” as reasons for moving.
Cultural context also seems to indicate that Americans live in larger family groups. Harris Poll survey conducted in 2021 generations unitedThe Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit found that Hispanic and black Americans (45% and 33%, respectively) are more likely than white Americans (19%) to live in multigenerational households. discovered.
increase of Multigenerational housing has also caught the attention of developers who are creating home designs and neighborhood plans specifically for these types of families. Home adjustments might be on the small side, like adding a railing to your bathroom. National Real Estate Association report. But other changes may include an extra kitchen or extensive changes to the floor plan for enhanced privacy.
Keep reading to see which states have the highest percentage of multi-generational households.
Marina Andreychenko // Shutterstock
#Ten.Utah

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.2%
– Total multigenerational households: 45.9K
Bernard // Shutterstock
#9.Arizona

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.2%
– Total multigenerational households: 118.1K
Jessica Kirsch // Shutterstock
#8.florida

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.2%
– Total multigenerational households: 359.4K
Terrestrial Photography // Shutterstock
#7.new jersey

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.5%
– Total multigenerational households: 155.9K
Resul Muslu // Shutterstock
#6.Maryland

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.5%
– Total multigenerational households: 107.1K
Drazen Jigiku // Shutterstock
#Five.Nevada

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.6%
– Total multigenerational households: 54.7K
Gavin Nelson // Shutterstock
#Four.Georgia

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.6%
– Total multigenerational households: 183.9K
mixtape // Shutterstock
#3.texas

・Multi-generation household rate: 4.8%
– Total multigenerational households: 513.1K
Photo of LM Park // Shutterstock
#2.California

・Multi-generation household rate: 6.1%
– Total multigenerational households: 822.3K
Fizke // Shutterstock
#1.Hawaii

・Multi-generation household rate: 8.2%
– Total multigenerational households: 40.2K
This story was originally published on the New Jersey Real Estate Network and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
Calamish // Shutterstock
be the first to know
Get local news delivered to your inbox.