President Donald Trump is making progress to undermine the power of federal officials through his enforcement actions.

In a court battle that helped restructure the role of administrative agencies, Trump directed the agencies to roll back regulations and signed an order that they would try to remain Accountability To the people through the president’s oversight.

“Trump is using enforcement to restore separation of power,” Josh Blackman, a constitutional law professor at South Texas Law Houston, told the Daily Call News Foundation. “It is very rare for a president to ask his administration to voluntarily surrender the power exercised by his predecessor. I think this is a positive and important trend.”

Trump signature Wednesday’s executive order rests on illegal or burdensome regulations that pose serious constitutional difficulties, “illegal delegations of legislative powers,” or social and political without “clear statutory powers.” or an agency directing that illegal or burdensome regulations be considered to imply an issue of economic importance.

Trump wrote order His administration’s policy is to “focus the limited enforcement resources of the administrative department on regulations justified by constitutional federal law and begin to dismantle the overwhelming and burdensome administrative state.”

“Ending federal responsibility and restoring the constitutional separation of power is my administration’s priority,” the order continues. (Related: Left Sue Everything – Morbes strategy could bring Trump’s ultimate victory)

Giancarlo Canaparo, senior legal fellow at the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies Center at the Heritage Foundation, said the order “not only is Trump’s seriousness in controlling excesses in regulated states, but also the seriousness of Trump. , said it was one of several orders. But his refined knowledge of how it works too.”

“For example, this order and another order will file more institutional litigation with the Information and Regulation Authority (OIRA), which ensures that other institutions are democratically accountable. It’s one institution,” he said. “That means more bureaucrats have to answer the only official elected in the administrative sector: the president.”

James Valbo, Chief Policy Counsel of the American Foundation for Prosperity; I wrote it On Thursday, Trump’s order was “an important first step towards removing unconstitutional, mass and harmful regulations.” Valbo represented a fisherman who overturned years of respect for the Supreme Court’s agency’s interpretation of the law in Ropper Bright Enterprises v. Raimond.

The executive order standards for assessing regulations reflect three major Supreme Court doctrines. “The end of the life of the Ropper of Respect for the Doctrine of Secular, the Government Agency’s interpretation of the law, and each key questions explained. Valvo explains the rules to the appropriate committee, and the legislature is appropriate. He argued that it should be included in the process by providing an opportunity to codify the rules of the law if they believe it is.

In January, Trump signed the order director To the agent Identify At least 10 old regulations to eliminate all new regulations issued.

However, some people do not view Trump’s approach to law as surrender.

Trump’s view on executives is contradictory to the long tradition that supposes that “the president’s policy direction will be examined by lawyers seeking to ensure legal compliance without regard to the president’s will.” I’m doing it. I wrote it Monday.

“Every modern presidency up to Trump 2.0 accepts that the administration’s legal issues are almost always decided outside the White House, and inevitably decided that there was something legal somewhere in the administration. I realized that some administration policies will be blocked or revised for lawyers. There is a problem,” he wrote. “This kind of basic commitment is necessary for the presidency to act according to the law.”

Continuing lawsuits challenging the actions of other Trump administrations could also have lasting impact on how the administrative department works.

The Supreme Court on Friday decided to refrain from delving into the controversy surrounding special adviser Hampton Dillinger, which he sued after Trump was fired. The lower court temporarily restored Dillinger to his position until February 26th. Discussed The emergency application included “an unprecedented attack on separation of power.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan newswire service that is free to use for legitimate news publishers that can provide large audiences. All republished articles must include logos, reporter signatures and DCNF affiliation. For questions regarding our guidelines or partnerships with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.