The Biden-Harris administration has made eroding trust in institutions a central strategy. They claim to fight authoritarianism, but the real fight is against the checks and balances that limit their power. For them, the separation of powers is Article 3,and First Amendment It’s an insult to their quest for centralized authority.

leakOnce a tool to expose corruption, it is now being used as a political weapon, not to expose wrongdoing, but to sow chaos and undermine public trust in the courts. This is not about transparency. It’s about controlling the narrative. (Related: Jason Sneed: The left is trying to rig the system to win)

Their goal is not to reform the judicial system, but to destabilize it, filling it with dynamic judges who legislate from behind the court.

Vice President Kamala Harris has described former President Donald Trump as a “fascist,” but her rhetoric is serving as a smokescreen for the administration’s own anti-democratic actions.

Consider what President Joe Biden is trying to do. bypass Supreme Court on Student Loan Forgiveness. With the blatant lawlessness of the courts; tried to remove trump from the ballot paper Colorado State and cases planned and devised to imprison political opponents.

This is not a defense of democracy, but an attack on it. Harris celebrate While these moves are efforts to help the American people, they reveal a deeper intent to circumvent constitutional limits and consolidate power.

Harris’ plan is to eliminate the filibuster It has become especially clear. The filibuster is more than just a procedural tool. This is the basis of the Senate’s deliberative process and ensures that bills must withstand debate and compromise. But for Harris, it’s just an obstacle that needs to be erased.

Without a filibuster, her radical policies could proceed unchecked. This desire to dismantle basic norms reveals a drive to turn the Senate into a rubber stamp, regardless of which party is in power.

Ironically, Harris, who warned that President Trump was eroding the system, is intent on destroying the process that prevents legislative overreach.

seek court packaging And judicial term limits follow the same logic. That is, if the existing system does not produce the desired results, it is destroyed and a more politically expedient one is built.

Ms. Harris and her allies hope Americans are looking for monsters under their beds, but the real danger lies in her policies.

Harris’ development of policy without a plausible explanation shows a lack of integrity in favor of appeasing voters.

On the other hand, President Trump’s carnival barker approach to politics is definitely interesting. His hyperbolic language captivates the audience and arouses curiosity about the issue. If President Trump declared that he was “hungry enough to eat a horse,” the press would search the stables.

This disconnect emphasizes division. Trump’s supporters draw a distinction between his policy proposals and the entertainment he provides.

By contrast, Harris’ rhetoric often lacks credibility. Her words ring hollow, leading to skepticism about her leadership and vision for this country.

Harris describes Trump as: existential crisis But the real threat is a political strategy aimed at dismantling checks and balances, sowing mistrust, and attacking great judges such as: clarence thomas.

The Biden-Harris administration’s approach is clear. If you lose in court, you attack the court. Facing opposition in the Senate, it seeks to eliminate the filibuster.

Their end goal is not reform, but an overhaul of the system to suit their purposes, allowing them to achieve through the courts what they cannot achieve through law alone.

The real threat to democracy comes not from former President Trump or those who question authority, but from those determined to redefine democracy.

Harris’ rhetoric may pretend to be a defense of democracy, but her actions reveal a chilling reality. She is actively trying to dismantle the very system she claims to be defending. This regime does not just govern, it seeks to replace control and restructure the republic at the expense of freedom.

In their quest for power, they have squandered accountability, leaving trust to crumble and the very nature of democracy at stake. The real danger lies not in those who question authority, but in those who redefine the boundaries of authority to suit their own purposes.

Frank Rich was the lead plaintiff in the landmark Supreme Court case, Rich v. DeStefano. He retired as a battalion commander in New Haven, Connecticut. He has testified before Congress and is the author of a book. Existence of command.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

All content produced by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent, nonpartisan news distribution service, is available free of charge to legitimate news publishers with large audiences. All republished articles must include our logo, reporter byline, and DCNF affiliation. If you have any questions about our guidelines or our partnership, please contact us at licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.