Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, expressed confusion Tuesday about why Supreme Court assistant judge Amy Connie Barrett opposed a ruling that allowed President Donald Trump to use the 1798 law to expel gang members.
The Supreme Court ruled late Monday that the Trump administration could use alien enemy laws to send members of Venezuelan prison gangster Tren DeLagua (TDA) in a 5-4 ruling. Tarly questioned why Barrett joined the deputy judges of Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson in opposition to the majority opinion. (Related: Jonathan Turley says even “liberal justice” might stop “Liliptian attacks” on Trump from district judges)
“The objection is a bit strange here. These four justices, especially Judge Barrett. [I] I still don’t know why Barrett joined the other way, which I wrote on my blog this morning,” Tarley said. “She joined in part, some of them said they would get the right to a legitimate process, but the majority said so. So, I’m still quite confused as to why Justice Barrett opposed it.”
clock:
“I’m sure Donald Trump does the same,” said John Roberts, co-host of the guest “American Newsroom,” with a laugh.
“There are all reasons to question the rushing conclusions of the majority that habeasants provide an exclusive means of challenge to alien law-based removal,” Sotomayor wrote to some of the opponents Barrett joined.
District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg issued an injunction on March 15th order The Trump administration spins two planes carrying members of a Venezuelan gang, heading for around El Salvador. Trump has issued several executive orders to address illegal immigration and border security. designation MS-13, a gangster at Mexican drug cartels, TDA and EL SALVADORAN prisons, was appointed as a foreign terrorist organisation on January 20th.
Trump Called The alien enemy took place in 1798 to accelerate the deportation of gang members.
Previously, Tarley pointed out that district judges like Boasberg had ignored signals from the High Court about national injunctions and the use of “forum shopping.”
“Even liberal justice complains. You can’t run a government like this. You can’t make endless Liliputian attacks of over 600 judges who maintain their government’s business,” Tarley said. “The Congress is going through that. But the Supreme Court has been clear for years. The Supreme Court majority has said in oral arguments. This in particular has to stop, that these judges have not heard of it.”
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts also suspends US District Judge Paula Sinis’ Friday’s order, demanding that the Trump administration return Abrego Garcia, an arbitrary member of El Salvadra prison gang MS-13, to the United States.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan newswire service that is free to use for legitimate news publishers that can provide large audiences. All republished articles must include logos, reporter signatures and DCNF affiliation. For questions regarding our guidelines or partnerships with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
