Breaking News Stories

ROOKE: I’d Like To Thank Joy Reid. Her Open Endorsement Of Porn For Kids Makes My Job Easier

MSNBC host Joy Reid wants more context on why parents are concerned about pornographic books depicting rape and incest being displayed in school libraries. Perfectly sums up why parents should never trust the media.

Progressive activists in the corporate media pretend that they are the “health of the team'' when it comes to content that is appropriate for children and what teachers should and should not teach in schools. I like to do things. They use their self-proclaimed moral superiority to feign concern for parent rights advocates who speak out about the corruption in our nation's school system, and the average viewer would rather listen to an education advocate than read a book about anal rape. I'll be worried.

Because of this, parents who are concerned about the quality of the content their children consume are often forced to take a defensive stance. After all, while their platforms are growing in popularity, they don't reach as many homes as, say, mainstream media show hosts.When Reed invites you moms for liberty Founder Tiffany Justice On her show “The Reid Out” discuss Perhaps this piece gave viewers their first glimpse into what exactly these books are projecting to children, and how far corporate media is willing to go to continue to push progressive narratives. There is a possibility.

Reed asked the judge about BookLook, a website used by Moms for Liberty to help investigate potentially harmful books in school libraries.Booklook website Claim It is not affiliated with any particular organization and is a free resource for parents to “make informed decisions about the content their children consume.” Reid argued that the website allows the group to use the “out-of-context text” in these potentially harmful books as an opportunity to ban them. (ROOKE: States follow blueprint to legalize new forms of child trafficking)

“Once we got out-of-context passages from these books, members of Mamas for Liberty would go to places like Broward County School Board meetings and read out-of-context passages from these books. “We're going to be making demands like this: We're going to demand that the school board remove them,” Reed said. “What I'm asking is, what support do you and other Moms for Liberty have in deciding that an award-winning book like All Boys Aren't Blue is not appropriate for students to read?” What kind of expertise do these people have?”

This seems like a perfectly logical question to the average progressive viewer who may not be aware of the problems in the American school system. But Justice's answer is that these parents actually have a clue about the progressive corruption at the school, and Reed's assertions contradict the idea that she has the intelligence to host a prime-time host. I quickly showed them that it was just as ridiculous.

“What a tragic story of a young man who was anally raped by an adult family member. So there's incest, rape, and pedophilia,” Justice says as Reed tries to interrupt. “Joy, you said you'd let me answer, so I'll answer for you. When is a strap-on dildo acceptable in a public school? That's my question to you. Strapons and teachers. Please give us the context of the rape of a minor child. We are talking about public schools.”

Reed did not realize that Justice had already dealt a fatal blow to the story by exposing the book as a pornographic retelling of the author's personal story. She asked the founder of Moms for Liberty why he had the right to decide which books were housed in public school libraries. Justice reminded her that the book was about incest, rape, and pedophilia. Still, Mr. Reed placed greater emphasis on the right of “liberal parents” to show their children books.

“Each parent must decide what is appropriate for their child to read. So I would like to ask you for your answer. I will ask you again. What do parents have the right to say to a parent who wants a child who may feel like they're in this book? Why don't they have that right? Don't you have the right to say you have access?'' Reid asked. (Luke: The left's transgender hysteria is harming people in ways we could never imagine)

This opened the door for Justice to deal a fatal blow to the progressive narrative about banned books. “If children feel seen by this story, it means they have been the victim of a predator. It means they have been raped by a family member or have experienced rape. I mean,” she said.

On prime-time MSNBC, a mother and education advocate was given the opportunity to demonstrate how broken the left's insistence on keeping this material in schools is. Mr. Reed did more than anyone else to eliminate the banned book fallacy on a national level. Perhaps she thought her question would frighten Justice, given the overwhelming power her slot gave her. But what Reed doesn't understand is that in this modern society, there are few things more powerful than a mother who goes into a lion's den to protect her children.

Thank you, Joy. You did us a favor. Now millions of people see your lies about worried parents for what they are. And at the same time, you've given our fight against progressive ideology room to gain even more power over our national narrative.

Share this post: