House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer on Tuesday lashed out at CDC Director Rochelle Wallenski during a hearing on the government’s role in censoring supposed “misinformation” about the novel coronavirus vaccine.

Mr. Kammer began his interrogation by asking Mr. Warenski, “Is there a difference between medical opinion and misinformation?”

“There are things in the literature that have been scientifically proven over and over again that eventually become facts, but I think there are ways to interpret them—” Comer said. Before interrupting, Warenski began to speak.

“Yes, rational people disagree about the future direction of medicine, right?” Kammer asked, noting that patients are often encouraged to get a second opinion.

“CDC records show that CDC officials sometimes issued warnings about social media posts they deemed misinformation. Did it make an impact?” he pressed. (Related: ‘Undermining Trust’: Mark Zuckerberg Reflects on Facebook’s Censorship of COVID-19 ‘Misinformation’)

Wallenski said he would not respond because the case is currently in litigation, and Kammer said the CDC was working with Facebook’s parent company Meta to publish a post believed to contain “misinformation” about vaccines. I asked if it was censored.

Wallenski changed his stance, acknowledging major credit for the vaccine that “saved us from this pandemic,” then reiterating that the issue was pending litigation.

🔥🔥🔥@RepJamesComer He told CDC Director Wallensky that the censorship of dissent during the pandemic was unacceptable and would be investigated. pic.twitter.com/aR3mLk9V3R

— Oversight Board (@GOPoversight) June 13, 2023

“So you don’t answer questions?” Kammer asked. “I often hear people say, ‘We are currently investigating.'”

Wallenski then said that the CDC is focused on spreading the facts, telling Kammer that the CDC is not 100 percent effective at preventing the spread of the virus, and that the CDC is not 100 percent effective in preventing the spread of the virus. I asked him if he had ever tried to suppress the allegation that Wallenski again declined to answer, but insisted the CDC was only interested in proving the vaccine was safe.

“Some perspectives censored by the government … turned out to be correct all along, but the government censored it. Possible leaks from labs … Vaccines did not stop the spread and contagion.” I wouldn’t say it was completely bad, but it didn’t prevent it from spreading or contagion.”

A series of “Twitter files” released in March revealed a massive conspiracy by several government factions, academia and big tech to censor certain discourses about the coronavirus. Among the true stories reviewed were stories about side effects of vaccines.