Overnight, the left-wing traditional media concocted a bogus story to downplay new FBI documents that allege President Joe Biden’s involvement in shady business dealings.
A Department of Justice (DOJ) whistleblower provided Republican Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley with an FBI-1023 form containing details of the alleged bribery of the Bidens. The documents include allegations that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden received bribes from Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, who founded the energy company Burisma.
In the allegations presented, Zlochevsky allegedly told FBI officials that it would take investigators more than a decade to find records of illegal payments to President Biden.
Being a journalist essentially means finding the truth (verifying information), but news outlets like CNN and The Hill have opted to skip that heavy lifting and go head-on into downplaying allegations.
The left-wing media couldn’t completely ignore the story and jointly decided to call the allegations into question using the phrase “unverified claims.”
Billing is as follows meaning A statement made “usually without providing proof or proof”. It was unnecessary to include “unconfirmed” across these headlines, but if you’re a media outlet with a history of giving shillings to the left, you’ll do whatever it takes to convince your audience that the potential dam allegations are simply the Republicans going wild again. (Related: ‘I’m in business with my son’: ‘Fox & Friends’ host reacts to Biden’s bribery documents)
The Associated Press (Washington Post only republished article because why would it waste time reporting bombshell remarks?) headlined the article, “Mr. Grassley Releases Full FBI Memo Containing Unconfirmed Allegations About Hunter Biden Activities In Ukraine.” CNN took a similar tack: “Mr. Grassley Releases Internal FBI Documents About Unverified Biden Bribery Allegations,” Insider “FBI Infuriated Mr. Grassley Releases Documents Listing Unverified Allegations About Biden,” The Hill “Republican Releases FBI Forms Listing Unverified Biden-Burisma Allegations,” And ABC News “In Unusual Move, Releases Unverified FBI Sources Report Alleging Biden Involvement.” Public,” emphasizing perhaps the scariest angle. by bribery. “
Running out of new media topics
“Unverified Claims” pic.twitter.com/nHlIeI2BWn
— Jeffrey Ingersoll (@GPIngersoll) July 21, 2023
Their coverage of these “unverified claims” is very different from the Steele Doss coverage, which was then “unverified” and later completely bogus, but laid out to be very legitimate.
CNN reported on the alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, which later turned out to be false, and wrote: “Schiff: New evidence of possible collusion between Trump and Russia.”
“The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee claims to have been presented with new information about collusion between President Donald Trump’s aides and Russia, suggesting it is ‘a type of evidence’ to be considered in a grand jury investigation,” the report reads.
Watch how CNN does it did not do it They say “claim without verifying”.
Or take a photo from November 2017 article It’s titled “Trump, Republicans Are Trying to Flip the Russian Collusion Story”.
At this point, they made no attempt to hide their bias, dropped the keyword “alleged” from the headline, and presented the information as if it were factual. To make matters worse, CNN tried to cover up the Hillary Clinton and DNC conspiracy, claiming that Republicans launched “attacks” on Democrats and others after it was revealed that Clinton and the DNC “financed opposition investigative efforts that produced controversial documents.”
It wasn’t “controversial”. it was fake.
Thankfully, CNN noted some of the allegations were “vile and unverified,” but I wish it had the tenacity to be accurate when reporting on “unverified claims.”
Thorough research of course found Former President Donald Trump and his allies colluded with Russia.
insider published The first paragraph of the 2017 article read, “The flood of revelations over the past few months has raised new questions about President Donald Trump and his campaign’s ties to Russia.”
There is no “unverified connection claim” or “suspected connection”, just “connection”. Let me remind you that the connection never existed.
ABC News He defended the Russia probe after President Trump criticized the tax-funded probe’s “honesty”.
“President Donald Trump… [is] “His critics are seeking the integrity of the Russia investigation,” ABC News reported, confirming that the investigation “has begun in earnest” and that the article made considerable emphasis in the article that although the documents were “not corroborated,” they were “disproved.”
