CNN
—
Republicans are expected to denounce President Joe Biden’s border policies on Wednesday, the first in a series of hearings on the issue since taking control of the House.
During the Biden presidency, Republicans repeatedly criticized the government On the handling of the U.S.-Mexico border, where an influx of immigrants is straining federal resources.Critics argue that historic arrest numbers are evidence that Biden’s policies aren’t working despite the majority of his administration Using the same protocol as the Trump administration, Border restrictions mainly in Covid times.
Now, with a majority in the House and leadership on key committees, Republicans have raised these criticisms in congressional hearings and will start hearings on the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday to highlight political vulnerability for the president. We are planning to grasp the problem that was.
The commission described Wednesday’s hearing as an inquiry into “border security, national security, and how fentanyl has impacted the lives of Americans,” but Republican lawmakers said they had no interest in immigration in the administration. It also serves as a platform for expressing dissatisfaction with the policies. Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican Ohio chairman of the committee, has vehemently criticized these policies and criticized the situation along the U.S.-Mexico border. We call it a “crisis”.
Witnesses to testify before the committee on Wednesday include Forever 15 Project co-founder Brandon Dunn. FentanylJudge Dale Lynn Carruthers County of Terrell County, Texas, and Sheriff Mark Dunnells of Cochise County, Arizona.
The hearing is billed as the first in a series. CNN previously reported that House Republicans planned to use their new majority to launch a public lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorcas. Prelude to impeachment.
The House Judiciary Committee is one of many committees to hold hearings on the state of the U.S.-Mexico border. The House Oversight Committee also plans to hold hearings on the issue and has already been in communication with the State Department over witnesses.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, said DHS “allowed” the four chief patrol agents to testify at the next oversight hearing that Comer invited the week of February 6. refused to do so,” he said.
However, according to a letter from DHS to Comer, DHS suggested that U.S. Border Patrol Director Raul Ortiz, who oversees the four investigators requested by Comer, testify before the House Oversight Committee, telling the sector chief will be made available for member-level briefings. Obtained by CNN, citing its own assessment of who was appropriate to testify.
The Biden administration is facing an unprecedented move across the Western Hemisphere that has contributed to a surge in immigration at the border, including immigrants from various countries such as Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua. The United States, which largely bans the deportation of immigrants to Cuba and Venezuela, presents DHS with a unique set of challenges.
In early January, the Biden administration expanded its humanitarian parole program to include Haitians, Venezuelans, Nicaraguans and Cubans, providing legal pathways to enter the United States instead of crossing the border. also qualified these nationalities for Title 42. This means that if you do not apply for the program, your application may be rejected by the authorities.
Since then, illegal crossings of the U.S.-Mexico border by immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela have declined significantly, according to the Department of Homeland Security, and the decline is due to new border measures. It has been with.
Meetings with migrants from these four nationalities dropped 97% in January compared to December, officials previously told reporters, citing preliminary figures. It is unclear how long this trend will continue, as the number of borders often fluctuates depending on conditions in the Western Hemisphere.
But already Republican-led states appealed to the administration above the program. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, along with 19 other states, argued in the lawsuit that the administration did not go through a rulemaking process of notice and comment before enacting the rule. As a result, states are asking courts to block the program.
Administrative authorities quickly rebelled.
“Some states trying to profit from these highly effective enforcement actions are trying to stop them and cause more irregular migration on our southern border,” Mayorcas said in a statement. I can’t understand,” he said.
