The Supreme Court will need to address how the Biden administration shaped the guidelines it cited to promote child gender reassignment.

As the high court considers the government’s challenge to Tennessee’s ban on child gender reassignment procedures, several amicus briefs filed this week are based on the Biden-Harris administration’s World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). ) would draw attention to the lack of clear evidence behind the criteria. quote As evidence, this procedure is medically necessary.

Alabama is also suing over a similar state ban. explained In a court brief filed Tuesday, the findings in the case show that “not only is WPATH’s emperor wearing no clothes, but that high-ranking HHS officials and ‘social justice lawyers’ are coordinating the organization. It has also become clear that.”

“Alabama, through years of litigation defending its own age limits against private plaintiffs and challenges by the United States, has exposed medical, legal, and political scandals that will be investigated for decades to come. ”, the state wrote. “The federal government, a prominent activist organization called Social Justice Lawyers, and self-appointed experts from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) conspired to remove age limits for sterile chemotherapy and surgery.” (Related: Top medical organization urges government to stop giving flavored e-cigarettes to children, but doesn’t want irreversible procedures for transgender people)

Levine, assistant secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), pressured WPATH to remove the age recommendation, court records show.

Alabama accused the Justice Department of trying to terminate the case while asking the Supreme Court to reconsider Tennessee’s case, which has “only a preliminary record and no evidence.” The state’s brief is one of several documents detailing what is missing. evidence Support government guidelines quote.

In a scathing Supreme Court brief upholding Tennessee’s Youth Gender Law, Alabama’s attorney general confesses: WPATH acknowledged that SOC8 had “little evidence” for treatment of youth; The age limit was removed after pressure from US health officials. WPATH has been adjusted to hide these… pic.twitter.com/9abI7YJ8YV

— Genspect (@genspect) October 15, 2024

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Scumetti I wrote The state’s preliminary statement states, “The government’s unilateral presentation of evidence misrepresents the medical situation.”

The brief includes European countries reversing their policies on minors’ transitions, a four-year review of transgender medical research conducted in the UK, and WPATH itself “waiving” review of evidence that could undermine litigation. It details how WPATH’s credibility has been continually undermined, including the decision to the goal.

“Now, with WPATH’s increased credibility, the government has turned to other organizations promoting the same policies: the AAP and the American Medical Association,” Scumetti wrote. “The Constitution does not require the state to play whack-a-mole with advocacy groups that meet the needs of challengers.”

Brief written by 22 states supporting Tennessee I wrote “There are still so many unknowns and debates that it would be dangerous to declare that the problem is solved.” (Related: ‘Social justice lawyer’ tells WPATH to avoid ‘evidence-based review’ of gender reassignment guidelines for minors, documents reveal)

“The Constitution does not make the judiciary the final arbiter of ongoing scientific debates,” the states wrote. “And no matter what anyone says, there is no question that there is an ongoing scientific debate about whether puberty blockers and hormones are safe and effective for children.”

missouri quotation The whistleblower who revealed that the state’s largest transgender clinic was “bullying” parents into having their children undergo irreversible medical procedures says the clinic was not even adhering to WPATH’s “lax standards.” He explained that this happens often.

“[Jaimie] Mr. Reed has made clear that the actual practice of gender transition interventions is far different from the sanitary façade that the United States portrays,” Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey wrote in a prepared statement.

Despite recent revelations, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association continue to side with the government. prompt Supreme Court blocks Tennessee’s ban.

“The widely accepted view in the professional medical community is that the appropriate treatment for gender dysphoria is gender-affirming care, and that some adolescents require puberty blockers and hormone therapy.” said the organizations in a preliminary statement submitted last month.

All content produced by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent, nonpartisan news distribution service, is available free of charge to legitimate news publishers with large audiences. All republished articles must include our logo, reporter byline, and DCNF affiliation. If you have any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact us at licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.